This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system business that develops open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the business in 2023 and serves as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design provides actions equivalent to other modern big language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were developed amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to limit the capability of these two countries to develop innovative AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its very first totally free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had gone beyond ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share price to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more established competitors has actually been described as “overthrowing AI”, [8] constituting “the first shot at what is becoming an international AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training information open-source, allowing its code to be easily readily available for use, adjustment, viewing, and designing files for developing functions. [13] The business reportedly intensely recruits young AI scientists from top Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer system science field to diversify its designs’ understanding and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading since the 2007-2008 financial crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, implying its code is freely available for usage, modification, and viewing. This consists of consent to access and use the source code, in addition to style files, for developing purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip restrictions on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started an artificial general intelligence lab devoted to research study establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s monetary service. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were hesitant in offering funding as it was unlikely that it would be able to produce an exit in a brief amount of time. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong performance for a low price, DeepSeek ended up being called the driver for China’s AI design price war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the price of their AI designs to compete with the company. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it was successful compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research study and has no in-depth prepare for commercialization; [20] this likewise permits its innovation to prevent the most rigid provisions of China’s AI regulations, such as requiring consumer-facing technology to abide by the federal government’s controls on details. [3]

DeepSeek’s hiring choices target technical abilities rather than work experience, leading to many new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI careers are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the business hires people with no computer system science background to help its technology comprehend other topics and knowledge areas, consisting of having the ability to generate poetry and perform well on the infamously challenging Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is offered totally free to both researchers and business users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license arrangement (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and responsible downstream usage” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction information. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was launched). It was established to compete with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper claimed benchmark results higher than a lot of open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the very same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat versions of the two Base models was likewise launched simultaneously, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed comparable performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a version of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are constantly queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They found this to help with skilled balancing. In basic MoE, some experts can end up being extremely counted on, while other professionals might be seldom used, squandering specifications. Attempting to stabilize the professionals so that they are similarly used then causes specialists to replicate the same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to learn core capabilities that are frequently used, and let the routed professionals to learn the peripheral capacities that are seldom utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K mathematics problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The reward model was a procedure benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd technique. [30] This benefit model was then utilized to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward model was continually updated during training to prevent reward hacking. This led to the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 models, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 stages. The very first stage was trained to solve mathematics and coding problems. This stage used 1 benefit design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The second stage was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow rules. This phase used 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and security benefit designs were trained on human preference information. The rule-based reward design was manually programmed. All qualified reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They decided for 2-staged RL, since they found that RL on reasoning data had “distinct qualities” various from RL on general data. For instance, RL on thinking might enhance over more training steps. [31]

The two V2-Lite designs were smaller sized, and skilled likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research study and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were substantially modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of experts (MoE) variant formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction data, then combined with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for mathematics problems was computed by comparing to the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was generated by a benefit design trained to predict whether a program would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is essentially the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of mathematics and programs than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, programming, logic) and non-reasoning (innovative writing, roleplay, simple question answering) information. Reasoning data was created by “expert models”. Non-reasoning data was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by humans. – The “skilled designs” were trained by beginning with an unspecified base model, then SFT on both information, and artificial information created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and validate throughout thinking. Then the expert designs were RL using an undefined benefit function.
– Each specialist design was trained to create simply synthetic thinking information in one specific domain (mathematics, programs, reasoning).
– Expert models were utilized, rather of R1 itself, since the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor format, and excessive length”.

4. Model-based benefit designs were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice information containing both final reward and chain-of-thought causing the last reward. The benefit design produced benefit signals for both concerns with objective but free-form responses, and questions without unbiased answers (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit designs and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was calculated for mathematics issues with a last answer (put in a box), and for shows problems by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek group performed extensive low-level engineering to achieve performance. They used mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the basic 32-bit, needing special GEMM regimens to accumulate precisely. They used a customized 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the communication latency by overlapping thoroughly calculation and interaction, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They decreased communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific machine each specialist was on in order to prevent specific makers being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outperformed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being accessible through DeepSeek’s API, as well as via a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical inference, mathematical thinking, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond efficiency of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it used 15 issues from the 2024 of AIME, the o1 design reached a service much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic information created by R1. [47]

A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant initially believes about the thinking process in the mind and then provides the user with the answer. The reasoning procedure and response are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking process here answer here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, “generally” of two types (other types were not defined): precision rewards and format benefits. Accuracy reward was examining whether a boxed answer is proper (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format benefit was inspecting whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to address these concerns and more improve reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but also with a “language consistency benefit” to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking data from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the created reasoning had an incorrect final answer, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking jobs) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar method as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly responds to concerns, fixes logic problems and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses considerably fewer resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers using as many as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require only about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested developing its newest AI technology. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly minimal expense has been recognized as possibly challenging the global dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was reportedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s newest models when used for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen similarly described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly praised DeepSeek as a nationwide property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to provide viewpoints and tips on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has highlighted possible limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, that include export constraints on innovative AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models subsequently “stimulated market turmoil” [57] and caused shares in major international innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech companies likewise sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] An international selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 model, had actually led to tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of value was cleaned off American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had mixed responses to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are involved in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “incredibly excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed skepticism of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to use the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interfered with the correct performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the official application shows user interface (API) version of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, uses censorship systems for subjects that are thought about politically sensitive for the government of China. For example, the design refuses to answer questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first produce a response, but then erases it soon afterwards and replaces it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship systems and constraints can only be gotten rid of to a limited extent in the open-source version of the R1 design. If the “core socialist values” specified by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are terminated. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and mentioned: “We securely oppose any kind of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are devoted to attaining the complete reunification of the motherland through tranquil ways.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers were able to trick DeepSeek into providing particular answers to some of these subjects by requesting in its answer to switch particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and privacy

Some experts fear that the federal government of China could utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms and conditions say “We save the info we collect in safe servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We might gather your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you provide to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security concerns. [80] In reaction, the Italian information defense authority is looking for additional details on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had actually begun a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government banned making use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s usage of individual information. [83]

Expert system industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed choosing “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user might utilize it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s low-cost, open AI design DeepSeek delights scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper designs and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI facilities spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may strike India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you must know”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI model conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model surpasses Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI design seems among the very best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik minute”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek positions a difficulty to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI design advancement highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek sparks global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “very excellent”: “We need to take the advancements out of China extremely, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends massive Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS consumers, including Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly limited brand-new sign-ups, mentioning ‘massive destructive attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t appreciate free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on an international AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of mayhem”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI postures formidable cyber, information personal privacy hazards”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise caution over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a huge TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on information defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House assesses effect of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.